![]() ![]() ![]() The following observations are concerned with the distinction between justice within consolidated polities and justice between such polities. The first one will deal with what we have experienced about the nature of “the economic” with the use of this notion, I wish to insinuate an analogy to what we associate with “the social” namely, the social embeddedness of the economy as Polanyians frame this concern. ![]() My account will depart from a tension inherent to the project, and I will submit three groups of observations: From all this, it follows that I feel compelled to construct a story of my own, one which cannot be the tale of an impartial spectator. Dimitry Kochenov, to name just one further culprit, leads his readers beyond philosophical models, while others warn against “agonising over a finely tuned theory of justice (Sionaidh Douglas-Scott). Readers are asked to embark upon practical philosophy, political theory, the whole rhapsody of “law-and” studies. Via a question mark, authored by Gráinne de Búrca, it invites the commentator to reflect on the sense of the whole project. It addresses Europe as a whole in a perspective which is both under-theorised and under-discussed. As the book which we are going to discuss is on Europe and edited by lawyers, I should feel comfortable. It is not an easy task to talk about a topic like Europe’s justice deficit. European and Transnational Governance NetworkĬhristian Joerges tackles the question of Europe’s justice deficit. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |